ICE (v1.0)
A role-playing game by Christopher Weeks
with Illustrations by Ian Armstrong

Ready,

Before time started counting, there was only blackness and the place of the angels. For the eternal instant that was before our time, the angels were creatures of perfection — occupied only with imagining wonders. Somehow, a great and terrible illness struck and the angels were grievously wounded. One by one, they withered and fell. As the last angel stood dying, she unlocked the mysteries of their immortal imaginings and, with the sweep of her arms the universe was born.

The world of land and ocean, of fire and rain, of creatures and men, came forth from nothing and the flow of time began. The souls of the angels were gone — passing to some other world or out of existence entirely. But their bodies remained. Perfect crystalline forms among the chaotic new world. The material of their remains: harder than stone or metal, as clear as any solid can be, always cool to the touch, and fairly dripping with power, came in time to be called Ice among the men of the world. The perfect bodies of Ice, over time and time, met the limits of their strengths. Cracks and breaks caused the form of the angelic bodies to vanish, replaced by rough, sharp chunks. These, in yet more time, were reduced to many, many small pieces. Relics of the dawn of time.

And men did covet the Ice. For with Ice — with the tiniest sliver of angelic power, men could accomplish great and unnatural things. But the Ice is too perfect for man to long behold. Too bright is this light from the dawn of time to gaze into without going blind. Those who too long sought to harness the power of the Ice forgot their connections to other men. Men whose great works benefited all others lost track of themselves, withdrawing inside, unable to connect or to care for others. They became islands among humanity, lost and adrift in the sea of men. Many went mad, simply stopped eating, and wasted away. Some, as it is told, turned to stone and their remains can still be found in this or that secret place.

In time, a caste of men arose to protect humanity from the blinding light of the dawn. Men who had a gift were born — able to sense the use of Ice from great distances and to sense one another, they banded together to form The Guild. To collect and destroy the Ice. To protect people from themselves. The early members of The Guild rounded up vast collections of Ice and did what they could to make it inaccessible. It is said that much was dropped into the deepest seas while some was buried in the magma of active volcanoes. While there are stories, there is no record of the actual destruction of Ice. And there are those — the naysayers, who claim that The Guild has merely stolen these relics from honest people trying to get ahead in order to maintain power. In truth, more than a few Guild members have met an untimely end at the hands of an angry mob, but each has sworn an oath of life to honor their destiny.

Set,

Ice is a game of story telling, role playing, decision making, and resource management. When you play Ice — no matter your role in the game, your job is to entertain your fellows. Remember this. It will improve your gaming experience. In a game of Ice, one player is the referee and has a number of special duties. The other players are each primarily concerned with operating their character in the shared game world. All of the players — including the referee, will sometimes:

The referee's additional duties include:

The player characters in Ice are Guild members. The defining characteristic of Guild members is The Sense. Each member has the ability to perceive an aura — a nearly subliminal tinge to perceptions of things touched by Ice. The Sense manifests as two special sensory powers: Foremost, they can sense the current use of Ice, sometimes from great distances. These characters know the exact direction in which the perceived phenomenon is taking place, the approximate distance to the point of use (to be described by the referee in vague terms that accurately indicate distance within a binary order of magnitude), and the number of relics used during the event. The number of Ice crystals used also determines the size of the aural disturbance and thus the range at which such detection can take place:

The second of these abilities is that those with The Sense can detect their peers. If one person with The Sense sees, hears, or otherwise directly perceives another, she will know it. Children who are born with The Sense are either: recruited by The Guild, murdered, or hidden very well.

Brunhilde is a Guild member
  • clear - Ice
  • black - Islandization
  • red - acrobatic
  • orange - violent
  • yellow - wealthy
  • green - equestrian
  • pink - comely
Arlo is a grenadier
  • white - tough
  • blue - broke
  • orange - short
  • pink - streetwise

A traditional icon of role playing games is the character sheet. In Ice, you almost don't need one. Mechanically, Ice characters consist primarily of a sack (or opaque cup, if that's easier) of six-sided dice. Writing the Character's name and history is easier on a sheet of paper, so you should go ahead and do that. It also gives you a good place to record the legend to your dice. Ice characters are described with a number of characteristics, each of which must be represented by a die color. For your character, you will choose what the characteristics are, how many there are and what weight each is given. Characteristics can be: personal abilities, vices, virtues, personality traits, skills, possessions, or anything else you can think of. The only limitation is that each must be indicated with a single word. These characteristics represent inner resources that you bring to bear when resolving conflict. There are definite advantages to having few and others to having many. In addition to the colors needed for representing your characteristics, you should also have a number of clear and black dice available to represent your Ice resources and your islandization. Each character begins the game with one Ice die and one Islandization die in addition to their twenty characteristic dice.

Defining what difficult means with regard to instigating a conflict is something that each group will naturally come to an understanding about.

A conflict occurs when different characters in a scene want different things to happen or when the referee decides that something a player has just stated about her character's actions is difficult. Conflicts are resolved by drawing an equal number of dice from the bags of the involved parties, rolling some or all of those dice and then taking turns specifying outcome statements about the conflict that are ultimately synthesized by the referee (with appropriate player input) into a resolution.

Jumping a short wall while on the run, may normally require no conflict at all. Clearing a two meter fence might be a 3-die conflict. Clearing that same fence while chased by dogs and archers should default to a 5-die conflict.

The first step to resolving a conflict that your character is involved in is to draw the appropriate number of dice from your bag, unseen. The number of dice drawn for conflict resolution is determined by the complexity of the conflict. A simple static challenge is a three-die event. The vast majority of opposed conflicts will be five die events. The players and referee may choose an alternate number of dice for a conflict when it seems appropriate. As characters controlled by the referee (non-player characters, or NPCs) are involved in conflicts, the referee must decide where the dice originate. For important, recurring NPCs, maintaining an actual sack is most appropriate — particularly for NPCs bearing shards of Ice. For most of the average low-importance mooks that will be involved, this is impractical. In these cases, the referee should have an idea of the characteristics appropriate for the character and just take one fewer dice than the conflict calls for.

After drawing, but before rolling your dice, you have the option of putting any number of them back in your bag — reducing the number that you have available for your roll — but saving those resources for later conflicts. (Ice dice must be used when drawn and islandization dice are automatically put back in the sack — they represent the ineffectuality and self-absorption caused by the use of Ice provide reduced statement power.)

Brunhilde is attempting to favorably manipulate the ambassador. She draws 1 clear, 1 green, 1 orange and two pink dice. She decides that violence would be out of place and so tosses that die back. Leaving the equestrian die in the roll with the two dice of comeliness and the Ice die is a bit of a gamble.

Once everyone has made their decisions about dice use, the selected dice are rolled. Consider the colors of the dice when making these decisions. If you want several small statements (which happen to be more likely to go first) then don't roll big color-blocs. If you want a single, more powerful statement, put back the singleton colors that you drew. And also consider the characteristic represented by the dice. That characteristic must be central to the outcome statement that you make with those dice. Read on for details.

Magical tone varies by group. Some groups accept making a mundane action bigger and better while others want something with more overt zest to define the event as magical.
Brunhilde rolls a one on her green die, two threes on her pink and a six on the Ice. Now she must assign the six of Ice to either the green one or the pink threes. She doesn't want to sacrifice the one for a small gain in scope so she includes the Ice in her comeliness roll. She effectively now has a green one and three pink sixes.

After rolling the dice, collect them into groups of like colors. Each group will be turned into an outcome statement that will shape the referee's narration of the conflict. Each group has a number associated with it that is equal to the highest number rolled within the group. The lower that number, the earlier in the conflict resolution process the statement will be made. The larger the group is, the more broadly the statement may apply to the conflict and the environment. Any Ice dice that were rolled must be assigned to groups of other dice. They might make the group go later (by contributing a higher number), they will increase the breadth of scope for that group's statement and they must add a magical tone to the statement.

Arlo is in a fight with a thug. He rolls white:2,2 blue:1 pink:2,6 while the thug gets white:1 red:1,2,2. The groups' highest number sets the value for the group so Arlo has a 1,2,6 and the thug has a 1,2. They both have a group of ones and because their groups are the same size, they check for twos. They both have one group of twos, but since the thug's group has three dice, the thug is the first conflictee.

Whomever has rolled the most groups of the lowest number achieved (1<2<3...) is designated first conflictee and will begin specifying the outcome statements. When determining first conflictee, ties for most e.g. 'one groups' are settled by the largest 'one group', then most 'two groups', etc. If the tie ever runs all the way up through most and largest 'six groups', it should finally be settled in favor of the player closest to the left of the player who initiated the conflict. Once you have a first conflictee determined, you're ready to start generating outcome statements.

There are four variables affecting the outcome statements: order, quantity, scope and domain. We will deal with each of these in turn but remember that the following rule always applies: the outcome statement should be as brief as possible with only one actual effect.

These outcome statements will be made by the involved players in up to six rounds (usually fewer) — one for each possible die result. Starting with the first conflictee and proceding clockwise, everyone with at least one 'one group' will make an appropriate statement. The trick to this is making valuable outcome statements given the die-groups involved. Also note, each statement is constrained by the statements that came before. If another character swings a sword at yours, your next statement may address a response to that swing, but may not undo it. The first statement of a resolution is unconstrained in this way and allows for a great deal of flexibility. However, later statements may react to those early ones and tend to have greater scope.

In another conflict, Arlo ends up with three 'two groups.' His opponent has only one. Because Arlo was the first conflictee this time, he must decide which of broke, short, and streetwise he wants to use to influence the outcome before his opponent does. After hearing his opponent's statement, he will use the other two.

When a player has more than one group of a number, she makes her first statement in the normal order for that round and the clockwise cycle continues until all statements are made for that number before advancing to the next. This usually means that one player gets an additional outcome statement after all of that number were made but could involve multiple players makeing multiple outcome statements all of the same number. When you have multiple groups of the same number you can generate your statements in the order of your choosing.

Various groups will tweak scope here and there. Some groups limit all statements to human interactions and others openly embrace other effects at the high scope levels.
Should the examples in this paragraph be extracted into this box? Should I have a more walk-throughish example?

The scope available to an outcome statement is dependent on the number of dice in that group. When a statement is using only one die, the scope of the statement is personal — the statement may only regard the character's behavior (e.g. "Christine tries to kiss Dalton"). A color-group of two dice means the statement may include multiple characters on the statement-maker's side of the current conflict (e.g. "we decide that fighting about it is senseless" or "the smith and his boys get the upper hand"). A scope of three expands to include all the participants in the current conflict. A four-die statement may include any people local to, but outside of, the conflict (e.g. "a squad of the town guard rushes around the corner"). A statement with a scope of five can include any people or factions that are capable of affecting the conflict (e.g. "a revolt in the fields calls away the town guard"). Finally, in the event that a player rolls six or more in a group, that player's scope is essentially unlimited (e.g. "an active lightening storm blows in" or "The city these traders just left is plague-infested").

The look and feel of angelic magic will be different for each group of players. Will your setting have lots of magical flash or a more subtle aesthetic in which larger-than-life effects are possible but not always obvious? What about other constraints? Are there only certain kinds of effects that magic can have?
The Ambasador did not form a 'one group' so Brunhilde's first statement is "I make an opportunity to express educated appreciation of the ambassador's fine race horses." The referee (for the ambasador) states "the ambasador's servants make it difficult for anyone to get close long enough for real conversation." Brunhilde's beauty — augmented with her Ice lays the groundwork for her final statement "No one can fail to notice my radiance and the ambasador is quite aware of my interest in him."

All outcome statements must make use of the characteristic associated with the dice rolled. Routine contact with Ice channels angelic power from the dawn of time. When Ice dice are included in a group, the outcome statement must account for the base characteristic rolled and include supernatural or magical elements. Acting as this conduit erodes the psychological filters that normal humans use to help in deciding how to react to varied situations. Thus, Ice users have extra personal resources to draw upon, but are only able to do so chaotically. This is an intentional challenge of the game and should be considered both: during character creation and when deciding which dice to put back in the sack after you draw. Also, for every Ice die rolled, a new Islandization die should be added to the sack.

The referee looks at the outcome statements, figures that while the ambasor's staff has been instructed to keep people distant, he can override such orders for any special guests he might have and instructs his people to direct Brunhilde to one of the private meeting rooms in the wing adjacent to the ballroom.

After all the statements have been made (and notes taken, as needed) the referee will narrate the outcome of the conflict. She too, may not undo or ignore any of the statements. She should understand the intent behind, as well as the letter of, the statements made and narrate an interesting best-fit resolution. As always, all the players may make use of "wouldn't it be cool if..."-style statements to help the referee when the outcome is ambiguous.

As you play Ice, you'll find a balance between awarding too many dice and not enough. It is one of the challenges for the referee. She must assure that the characters are able to actually do things while also making sure that the players stay hungry for more dice. Some players consider such concerns to be bad for a game because it is counter to immersive playing, but this kind of resource management is a crucial aspect of this game. (and many others!)

The flow of the available dice is the real mechanic of continued character effectiveness. As dice are used in conflict resolution (i.e. rolled), they leave the sack of available resources. This is the primary reason that the ability to choose which dice not to roll is important. Islandization dice are gained through the use of Ice. Ice dice are gained through narrated acquisition of Ice crystals. (In most settings, this should be a source of play material, but not a real obstacle.) Islandization dice slowly leave the system. At the end of each game session, each player should remove one of these black dice before recording what remains for recomposition before the next game session. Ice dice leave the sack the same way they get there, by narrating the character doing something with their Ice. It could be as simple as giving the crystal to someone else, but there should be powerful in-game social obligations to rid the world of the Ice rather than just passing it off to some other hapless schmuck. Finally, regular characteristic dice are gained through award by the referee under three circumstances: Any scene in which a character is an active participant ends with the player adding a die of her choice to her sack. Whenever a player, through description of her character's behavior, dialog, reaction, etc arouses exceptional response (such as a round of "oooh" from her fellows) the referee should feel encouraged to award a bonus die of some appropriate characteristic — possibly a new one. And then, when a character is played in a way that is particularly evocative of a listed characteristic, the referee can award a die of that type. These awards can be a bit tricky. It is a matter for each group to find a satisfying set of criteria to follow so that awards are none of: too frequent, too scare, or imbalanced. Remember that all the players should always feel free to make suggestions to one another. This includes "reminding" the referee when such awards are appropriate.

Go!

Emeralda is the seat of government for an ancient world-spanning empire. The rest of the empire really only exists to pay tribute to the throne. The Guild is headquartered in the city and works tightly with the emperor. Ice is outlawed to the common man (for their own protection, of course) and teams of Guild-member special operatives are used by the government to enforce the law. Because of their special abilities, training, and support network, Guild-members are given special dispensation for Ice use, though interventions are known to be sometimes needed. The player characters make up one of these teams
In Old Kehljerii, the local god-king — Onsera controls the great secrets of turning crude iron into steel. Sometimes he turns out the finest steel in the history of mankind. No one knows his tricks, but he uses Ice to do it. In ancient times the gods who came before harnessed the power of Ice and formed a Guild of men to whom they granted limited powers to use the Ice. This Guild was established to concentrate and safeguard the Ice and the rest of humanity. Onsera's great, great, great grandmother saw that the organization of men would grow corrupt and she installed their powers into the nature of womankind. Now, only girls are born with the Guild powers and each has the duty to raise the young of their kind as apprentice and to collect all Ice in the furnace at the heart of the mountian.

In addition to the generic setting issues mentioned to the left, there are some specific questions that you should answer about The Guild and their role in society. How strongly does The Guild monitor and influence the members? Is The Guild a force of good or evil, or just a bureaucracy? What, if any, motives and practices does The Guild hide? And what stance does The Guild take members using Ice? In your game, The Guild may be a powerful force with which the characters interact constantly or it may be a far-removed source of idle speculation and these are some of the most direct things you need to shape for your game. With just a paragraph you can set the stage for play. A different paragraph will lend a very different environment.

Don't create a world. Create as few in-game venues as possible about your setting, but flesh them out nicely. Know a fair amount about your starting city or town and the schematically-adjacent locations. Let the game go where it will and invent places as needed. The players will request any new places that they need. For further ideas on establishing your setting, I suggest reading Sorcerer and Sword by Ron Edwards.

Now you know the constraints on the setting placed by this game — the rest is up to you. Dark ages or renaissance, semi-historic or fictitious world, these are matters of aesthetic and left to you. The ultimate goal of The Guild — if not the player-characters in your game, is to return the Ice to the original, pristine, "dawn of time" state in which it was a force of beauty and goodness. You may choose to incorporate any of a variety of philosophies that deal with the metaphysics of Ice and angels or you may ignore those issues and turn the focus another way. The game leaves this up to you. Mechanically, the game will always be about how (and whether!) to use Ice responsibly.

You also know how to generate characters and resolve conflicts. You may have noted that there is no system in place for damaging characters. Damage is simply narrated. Any character can suffer superficial damage as the outcome of any conflict when appropriate. It is also up to the individual players to indicate through outcome statements or conversation that their character is available for more serious damage up to and including death. Injuries like these act as non-mechanical constraints on narrated play. There is only one circumstance in which the game dictates character death. If at any time, all the dice in a player's sack are Islandization dice (black), that player's character turns to stone. The player has full narrative rights to describe the exact circumstance of the transformation — given that she, again, may not undo any of the conflict that was just narrated.

As noted, the mechanics of the game focus on how to use Ice without losing yourself. As your character acquires crystals/shards/pieces of Ice, you should be adding Ice dice to your sack. Any time you get rid of a piece of Ice, remove one of these dice from the sack. As the characters (often, NPCs), engage in mundane (conflict-free) tasks, they have the opportunity to use Ice to aid them. Because the use of Ice is the point of the game, this use (how and why) and the results should receive some narration. Each time Ice is used for such a task, roll a die for each piece used. Whenever a six is rolled, add an Islandization die to that character's sack.

The selection of characteristics is a bit funny. Considering the extremes: a character with one die each of twenty types is certain to have a limited scope in conflict and has a much easier time gaining dice through play, while a character with twenty dice of one characteristic always knows what to be planning for, has the certainty of broadly scoped outcome statements (with only one subject) and the hardest time keeping her sack of dice fed. There are different kinds of power with different advantages and disadvantages.

The way that your group handles scene framing will be unique. A game where the referee dictates most things about the story's flow may more closely emulate other games that you've played. This might make your group happy. Other groups want to specifically minimize the extra "story power" that the referee bears and they portion out scene-framing duties equally. Try it both ways.

In the first paragraph of the "Set" section above, you read that all players set scenes up. Here's how that works. The non-referee players should each request (or be prompted for!) descriptions of scenes in roughly (or exactly) equal amounts. Interspersed through these scenes are scenes framed by the referee. All the players will be expressing their agenda through the scenes they choose. The referee will also be weaving the stories of the players together and providing entertaining adversity.

This is the first big revision of my first game. I did most of the thinking about this revision while sitting in Chicago-Midway Airport during a layover.

Feel free to contact me about this game with any questions or comments on G+ or by emailing clweeks at Google's big email platform.
—Chris

Ice 0.0 Ice 0.1 Ice 1.0